In the last month I have found the time to begin looking at the 2012 CBECS data released by the EIA last May.
Today I am writing about something I just learned concerning U.S. Worship Facilities. Here I am looking at the subset of Worship Facilities that meet the criteria stated by the EPA for performing their multivariate regression for the Worship Facility ENERGY STAR model (about 80% of all U.S. Worship Facilities).
In comparing the 2012 and the 2003 CBECS data for Worship Facilities we see there was an estimated 2% increase in the number of these buildings. As there is an 8-9% uncertainty in the estimated number of these facilities, this increase is not statistically significant. The EIA data show that the mean site energy use intensity (EUI) for these facilities actually went down by 15% from 48 to 41 kBtu/sf — and this reduction is statistically significant as it exceeds the 6-8% uncertainty in these figures. No doubt some government agency will use this reduction to claim success in programs to promote energy efficiency.
But nature is not impressed because total energy used by these buildings actually went up. The reason — the buildings are, on average, getting bigger! From 2003 to 2012 the total gross square footage contained in this filtered subset of Worship Facilities increased from 3.2 to 3.8 billion sf, a whopping 23%. Thus the total site energy used by Worship Facilities grew by 5%. A similar conclusion can be made for source energy, even with the improved efficiency of the electric power sector over this last decade.
It should be noted that statistics show that the number of Americans who actually go to church declined by about 7% from 2007-2014. So in a decade when religious worship is decreasing the amount of energy used by Worship Facilities has grown by about 5%.
Bottom line — don’t be fooled by decreases in building EUI. It is total energy that matters.
Well done. Your bottom line lesson is the same that Jevons began making about 175 years ago (i.e., Jevons Paradox: as energy efficiency increases, so does total consumption).
Right you are!
Creates images of government bureaucrats spending their time figuring out how to spin failure into success with numbers.
“No doubt some government agency will use this reduction to claim success in programs to promote energy efficiency.”